When Green is Black

Green or Black?

I've lived a bit longer than many, not as long as some, and I've observed the craziness in the environmental movement.  First I want to say that God placed us in this world and we are to be responsible stewards of the environment.  I'm not against taking care of the planet although I am against many of the idiotic environmental blunders of the "green movement" that has been forced on us.

A few of examples I've been thinking about since they have been on the news recently.  The first one is the "plastic shopping bag ban".  While this ban is acceptable in some aspects, it is being forced on people and faulty data and information is being used to implement it.   While I agree it is a problem in the oceans and whales do digest them leading to their deaths, the United States does not dump their trash into the ocean.  The bags end up in recycling programs and in landfills in the U.S.  Why does a whale who ingested 20 "plastic" grocery bags that was dumped into the ocean by some other country dictate what American consumers can and cannot do?  When the bags were introduced, the "environmentalists" were behind it because of how many trees they would save - the same environmentalists who now want them banned.  Also many of the bags are degradable and non-toxic if disposed of properly.  The best solution is to have the bags recycled and disposed of properly implementing correct recycling procedures for the bags.  One of the biggest problems using reusable bags is the health issues:  Carrying meat in it then vegetables without proper washing in between.  This can spread bacteria within the store to be picked up by other consumers.  This is why one use bags were originally implemented in the stores in the first place.

The second item I have been thinking about is the new "electricity saving" light bulbs.CFL light bulbs save electricity but their disposal will not only create a mercury toxicity in landfills, they are also a fire hazard.  The two times I used CFL light bulbs, when they have burned out, both began to spark and created a fire hazard.  I stopped using them immediately (te first time I thought it was a "fluke").  CFL bulbs also contain mercury which is highly toxic and is environmentally unfriendly.  Last time I did the research, all of the CFL bulbs were manufactured in China and are definitely not the quality of American made incandescent light bulbs.   The move towards CFL bulbs is exactly the same as the plastic bag movement of years ago:  Environmentalists are not thinking of the consequences of the CFL bulbs and this will lead to a major mercury toxicity problem they will cry about in a few years.

Another example of how environmentalists do not think before they force implementation of their "environmentally friendly" unfriendly changes is in electricity.  They are against nuclear energy because of the waste storage issue (as well as the risk of nuclear meltdowns, etc.) they are against hydroelectric dams because of the fish migration (mainly endangered salmon) and because of the earthquake risk with dams.  They were the ones who promoted wind farms for "free electricity from the wind".  The same environmentalists that touted wind farms and wind energy are now complaining about wind farms because birds are being killed by the blades on the wind turbines.  They are also complaining because the wind turbines are noisy.  All this after many utilities spent fortunes building wind farms to be "environmentally friendly" at the insistence of the environmentalists.

Many people are purchasing electric cars to be "environmentally responsible" and not us the "fossil fuels" the environmentalists claim is responsible for "global warming" (I'll write about that one later)  While I applaud the measures in some respect, this is being done without thinking of the consequences.  While the president and environmentalists may applaud the saving of the fossil fuel and no carbon emission from these vehicles, when these vehicles die or are totaled in collisions, they are not able to be rebuilt or recycled.  All of the electric cars will be added to the landfill - including all of the batteries containing corrosive and toxic materials (I believe the cars have the equivalent of six regular car batteries?) which is a bigger environmental problem than if the car had just burned fossil fuels and was able to be parted out / recycled.  This environmental problem will be "discovered" long after billions of tax dollars will be spent installing electric charging stations along major highways. It's too bad Nikola Tesla was not taken seriously on free electricity cars when he was still alive.

Just because something sounds good for the environment on the surface does not mean that it is.  The consequences of changes need to be contemplated before implementation (too bad voters didn't heed that warning in the last presidential election!)  Many changes "for the environment" have made environmental "problems" worse, not better.  Before you make a change or support a change, do your homework for all possible consequences first.

INTJ thought process / entertaining conflicting theories

Many people have asked how I can be bringing up theories that conflict with my conclusions.  This is how INTJ's think:  We entertain different ideas as a way to test our conclusions.  We even consider "way out" theories (IE: my "tinfoil hat" theory ---I have met a real nephilim) as a matter to rule out the possibilities. 

Aristotle puts it best:

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    Aristotle

Just because I think about a different theory does not mean I accept it.  It's just a way of either finding the facts or strengthening my opinion.  No matter what theory I contemplate and consider in the Kyron Horman case, the conclusion I come up with is the same:  It was a parental abduction by one of the birth parents and most likely by Kaine Horman.  If there are facts that points me elsewhere, I'll go with the facts --- but so far, I have not found any.  If anyone has any facts I have not considered, feel free to post them (I'll keep them private if you request) but so far everything new I find out points to Kaine Horman being guilty of hiding Kyron (at the very least)

Because law enforcement has basically called off the investigation, I suspect that this has changed from a criminal case to a domestic issue and Kaine has told them to not report on it.  Law enforcement will do as the family wants as has been shown in numerous other cases.  One I discussed early on when I started this blog and alluded to in yesterday's (I believe it was yesterdays) post.

All of the theories I've considered.  Many are out there and I do not believe are very likely.  Just because I discuss a "tin foil hat" theory or CIA parent theory does not mean I find them to be very likely.  Of course if we were given any real information from law enforcement, I may change my theory entirely.  What we know, and what I have found out, I still stand by the theory that Kaine Horman is hiding Kyron (if he did not kill him or cause him to be killed)  Is Kyron in Germany?  or the Seychelles?  or even Saudi Arabia?   or with MM in Seattle?  (yes, MM, I have always known about you and your master manipulator games),  or is he home with Kaine hidden in the house in the woods in Portland?  I do not know.

With Dr. Pickle's help, I've been able to find out more information than I would have been able to find out on my own.   Not sure how much time before this world erupts into ww3 and want to thank him now publicly for all of his and his wife's help in helping to find out what happened to Kyron.

If anyone has any real information / facts that pokes holes in my theory, please send them to me.  If you can disprove my theory, I'll change it entirely (things either Kaine or Desiree said is propaganda, not facts)  I'll keep your posts private if requested.

For those who know Kaine:  Kaine has never refuted anything I've posted.  ask him directly if he has Kyron and who has custody of Kiara.  So far Kaine has manipulated his followers thought process to make them think he is innocent but he has never publicly said he did not kidnap Kyron or have anything to do with Kyron disappearing from school.  He never even searched for his son while raising money for searches that never happened.  .Any questions he was ever asked he had in advance and could script his answers or had a prepared statement.  It is time Kaine Horman publicly answered questions - in front of live media and unrehearsed / unscripted and no prepared statement.  By himself without Desiree (or anyone else) sitting there agreeing with everything he says.  Kaine refuses because he is afraid of getting tripped up and letting something slip.

We're waiting for some real answers, Kaine.  Don't you want people to believe you will do anything to bring Kyron back?  Time to use the KYRON Horman foundation money to increase the reward fund.  The reward of $50,000. with your salary is PATHETIC. It seems you don't really want him back.

Middle East war extremely close - time to repent is NOW

If you have not accepted Yeshua (Jesus) as Messiah (Lord and Savior) or are not obeying God (living for hHim with no intentional sin), your time to choose to do so without having to die as a martyr during the tribulation is coming to an end.  The rapture of the TRUE Christians (many false ones will be left behind) is about to happen.  Maybe it will happen as nukes start flying - even before they hit their targets.  Regardless, there is very very little time left.  Either choose Salvation and accept Yeshua as Messiah or be prepared for the worst times this planet has ever faced.  Early on during the seven years much of the world's population will die from war, hunger, and pestilence.  It will not be a fun time.

The choice is yours to make.  It will be easier to choose now before you have to give your life.  If you cannot live for God now, it is unlikely you will be able to die for Him later.  Choose His free gift through Messiah Yeshua's atonement for your sin (His death to pay for your sins)  After the rapture, there will be another post that I have prepared ahead of time (post dated)

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

http://www.debka.com/article/21529/

Barak vs US: We can't wait until Iran declares it has a nuclear bomb

DEBKAfile Special Report December 1, 2011, 11:28 AM (GMT+02:00)

Major US-Israel differences surfaced suddenly Thursday, Dec. 1, over the timing and circumstances of an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, when Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint US Chiefs of Staff, said: "I don't know whether Israel would alert the United States ahead of time if it decided to take military action against Iran." Three hours later, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak maintained US policy would enable Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon without the possibility of attacking it.

In an interview, General Dempsey went on to admit a range of differences between the US and Israel on two key issues: The first related to their expectations from the sanctions and the diplomatic moves being taken by the Obama administration, “with the stated intent not to take any options off the table” – language that leaves open the possibility of future military action.

“I am not sure that the Israelis share our outlook” on this matter, said the American general.

The second issue on which the Americans and Israelis are divided is their perspective on the future course of events relating to the Iranian nuclear program and the Middle East:  “And … because to them this (a nuclear-armed Iran) is an existential threat I think probably that it’s fair to say that our expectations are different right now,” said Gen. Dempsey.

In an early morning radio interview, Ehud Barak laid Israel's cards on the table with unusual frankness: He said he would be happy if diplomatic moves and sanctions were to stop Iran’s nuclear program and make it possible to give up the military option, but he does not believe that is the case.

 “They (the Americans) tell us - What’s the hurry with an attack on Iran? Wait until (Ayatollah) Khamenei announces that Iran is abandoning the NPT (nuclear non-proliferation treaty). The Iranians will break the locks (IAEA inspection seals at Iranian uranium enrichment plants) and then it will be clear to all that they have a nuclear weapon.”

Barak added: “The difference between us and the Americans is this: We say that because the Iranians are busy moving their nuclear program to underground facilities, they can announce this (that they have a nuclear weapon) after it is no longer possible to attack it." He went on to warn that If Israel is pushed into a corner, “it will have to act.”

In other words, Israel is not willing to wait, as the Obama administration proposes, until diplomatic moves and sanctions against Iran have achieved their aim, mostly because Israel is not ready to let Iran complete the transfer of its nuclear facilities to underground facilities and so make them safe from attack.

According to debkafile’s military and intelligence sources, Israel gives Iran no more than six to eight months to complete this transfer, i.e., by June to August, 2012.

Another point made by the Israeli defense minister was that some of Iran's nuclear facilities have already been hidden underground and are therefore impossible to monitor, even by military satellites. He was referring especially, our sources say, to the Fordo bunker site near Qom where, according to intelligence data, Iran is about to start enriching 20-percent grade uranium to 60 percent. This would bring the program to a few weeks away from weapons grade uranium for a bomb or a warhead.

On Tuesday, Nov. 29, former IDF military intelligence chief Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin estimated that Iran had already accumulated sufficient enriched uranium to build 4 to 5 nuclear bombs.

In his interview Thursday, Defense Minister Barak also answered former Mossad chief Meir Dagan's persistent arguments against an Israeli military strike against Iran on the grounds that it would immediately trigger a regional war:  Syria, Hizballah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad would launch attacks on Israel, seriously battering the country and inflicting heavy casualties, in Dagan's view.

Israel, Barak replied, is nowhere near being paralyzed by messages of doom. The degree of damage and number of civilian casualties would not, in his view, be alarmingly high. He repeated his estimate of early November that the casualty figure from a combined Arab missile assault resulting from an attack on Iran would be  “a lot less than 500” – especially if people took cover.

The defense minister concluded this comment by saying:  I have no idea what may happen tomorrow morning in Syria, or in Egypt.” debkafile’s military sources interpret this as meaning that the danger of a new Middle East regional war is already present  - unrelated to a possible Israeli attack on Iran, but rather as a result of the volatility set up by the uprising in Syria and the predicted rise to power in Egypt of the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi Islamists.

Clarification

If anyone took Kyron to rescue him from being sexually abused by Kaine Horman, they deserve an award.  My stating that anyone should be punished is if they took him:   my intended meaning was if they took him maliciously for no reason other than retaliation (of course if a stranger took him and it was a stranger abduction, they need to be fully prosecuted - the same if he were taken to be abused).  Anyone who risks all to PROTECT a child deserves to be commended, not judged.

This is not to say I believe anyone rescued Kyron, but if they did, they deserve an award.  I still fully believe Kaine Horman snatched him in order to save himself and to get custody of both his known / acknowledged children, and has him in hiding.

My Answers to 'kept private' questions regarding the Kyron Horman case

1.  I believe if Terri Horman had taken Kyron Horman to protect him from being molested by Kaine Horman she would have also protected her daughter Kiara as well - unless she knew Kaine was only interested in little boys.  She would probably have not known this or taken this chance since Kaine's brother Kristian was convicted for molesting a girl and because Kiara was Kaine's first daughter so probably the only baby girl he had been around.  If Terri was responsible for Kyron disappearing to protect him, she would also protect her daughter.  Of course we do not know who has primary custody of Kiara or even if Kaine is allowed to see her.  The master manipulator has made his puppets believe he has full custody of Kiara but we do not know this.  We only know what Kaine and Desiree tell the media and what propaganda their trained sock puppets spread on the forums and social media sites.

2.  I suspect if Kaine is hiding Kyron and Kyron is not being hidden at home with him, then Kyron is in the North Seattle area either in the UW (Go Huskies!) area or Shoreline or with friends in the Portland area.  Another possibility is with his friends / family near Munich Germany (or possibly Berlin)  There are a few internet searches from other countries I find very interesting- people from countries one would not expect to be doing an internet search for Kyron Horman (and countries with no active public access proxy servers - those are easy to filter out)

3.  Multnomah Sheriff and the media is most responsible for directing attention towards Terri and I'm quite sure it was with prompting from Kaine and Desiree Young (Kyron's birth mother).  Desiree claimed she "knew Terri did it" when she received the phone call that he was missing.  It appears the scapegoating of Terri began the very night Kyron went missing.  Reading some of the early articles, they state that 'no evidence of an abduction' so if it wasn't an abduction and they did not find him in the fields or woods, what was this statement suppose to make people believe?  It is another example of a master manipulator.  The only conclusion most people would make if they did not think it over is that "Terri did it" without them saying anything to that affect.  Master manipulators can make you draw the conclusion they want you to without saying it directly.  Desiree has alluded to emails that Terri was suppose to have sent that expressed hatred for Kyron and blaming him from everything from a failed marriage to world was three --- yet many believe "Terri hated Kyron" without any evidence that the emails are real or any evidence Terri hated Kyron.  If the emails are real, who is to say Kaine did not send them to set Terri up because he had Kyron's disappearance all planned out?  The gullible sock puppets believe Desiree without Desiree stating what Terri allegedly wrote because they have already been brainwashed by master manipulators to conclude "Terri did it" (without even knowing what "it" is)  I believe Desiree is being manipulated / coached by Kaine to do this.

4.  If this is a family case and no longer a criminal investigation, law enforcement may never tell the public if the family wants it kept private.  This is irresponsible since millions of tax dollars was spent and the birth parents made it into a national media covered case.  With Kaine and Desiree going on national TV and pointing their fingers at Terri, they should have lost all the privacy they now seem to want.   They should have thought of their own privacy before they went on national TV to point their fingers at Terri.

5.  I believe Kaine was scared of Terri taking Kyron to the doctor.  He may have been afraid that Kyron was going to tell Desiree that weekend about going to a doctor or about what his dad had been doing to him.  Instead of waiting for Kyron to get back from Desiree's that weekend, Kaine arranged to take Kyron and vanish him before he could tell Desiree what was happening.  remember: Desiree claims Kyron did not want to leave her.  It could be because his dad was molesting him.  Terri may have been trying to tell Desiree about what was going on but Desiree did not believe it - and now Desiree is feeling guilty because she did not listen to Terri and is projecting her own guilt onto Terri.  The problem is Desiree changes her stories almost as much as Kaine.  It could be, as I believe,  she is being manipulated by Kaine and saying what he wants her to say.  Her first story was Terri always sent her newsy emails and how they were happy together as a blended family - then once Kaine served the divorce papers (the divorce he always planned on getting and had planned out for months), Desiree's tone and attitude towards Terri changed.  I think the reason Desiree may have thought "Terri did it" and thought that from the start is that Kaine had called her and planted that seed in her mind for her to think about on the trip to Portland that afternoon.